The White House Office of Management and Budget is moving to take more control of billions of dollars in federal grants. Critics say the proposed change would jeopardize the integrity of U.S. science.
If formalized, the rule would make political priorities the prime determinant of what science gets funded and sideline the ...
Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. National Institutes of Health indirect costs, which are under the knife, go toward managing laboratories and facilities. Fei ...
Scientists across multiple disciplines are raising the alarm after the White House proposed taking greater control over how scientific research gets funded and allowing political appointees to decide ...
Nearly every modern medical treatment can be traced to research funded by the National Institutes of Health: from over-the-counter and prescription medications that treat high cholesterol and pain to ...
Trump’s latest move is a continuation of his actions against the NSF and US science as a whole.
America has long been the undisputed global leader in science and innovation, propelling our economy and improving everyday lives at home and abroad. But federal support for scientific research and ...
The Office of Management and Budget has proposed rule changes to insert a political review step into the scientific ...
About a year ago, it seemed the sky was falling for American scientific research. The Trump administration last February cut thousands of workers at federal science agencies, squeezed the flow of ...
America has already lost its global competitive edge in science, and funding cuts proposed in early 2025 may further a precipitous decline. Proposed cuts to the federal agencies that fund scientific ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results